Due to the change in the survey instrument regarding intention to vaccinate, our estimates for “hesitant or unsure” or “hesitant” derived from April 14-26, 2021, are not directly comparable with prior Household Pulse Survey data and should not be used to examine trends in hesitancy. To support state and local communication and outreach efforts, ASPE developed state, county, and sub-state level predictions of hesitancy rates (https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/vaccine-hesitancy) using the most recently available federal survey data. We estimate hesitancy rates at the state level using the U.S. Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey (HPS) (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey.html) data and utilize the estimated values to predict hesitancy rates at the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA) level using the Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS)(https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/microdata.html). To create county-level estimates, we used a PUMA-to-county crosswalk from the Missouri Census Data Center(https://mcdc.missouri.edu/applications/geocorr2014.html). PUMAs spanning multiple counties had their estimates apportioned across those counties based on overall 2010 Census populations. The HPS is nationally representative and includes information on U.S. residents’ intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine when available, as well as other sociodemographic and geographic (state, region and metropolitan statistical areas) information. The ACS is a nationally representative survey, and it provides key sociodemographic and geographic (state, region, PUMAs, county) information. We utilized data for the survey collection period May 26, 2021 – June 7, 2021, which the HPS refers to as Week 31.. PUMA COVID-19 Hesitancy Data - https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/Vaccine-Hesitancy-for-COVID-19-Public-Use-Microdat/djj9-kh3p
This dataset has the following 21 columns:
Column Name | API Column Name | Data Type | Description | Sample Values |
---|---|---|---|---|
FIPS Code | fips_code | text | FIPS codes are numbers which uniquely identify geographic areas | 36067 53063 13157 48181 29155 view top 100 |
County Name | county_name | text | Name of County | Carroll County, Virginia Hickman County, Kentucky St. Martin Parish, Louisiana Lincoln Parish, Louisiana Greenup County, Kentucky view top 100 |
State | state | text | State | TEXAS GEORGIA VIRGINIA KENTUCKY MISSOURI view top 100 |
Estimated hesitant | estimated_hesitant | number | Estimate of percentage of adults who describe themselves as “probably not” or “definitely not” going to get a COVID-19 vaccine once one is available to them, based on national survey data. | 0.1018 0.1365 0.1241 0.087 0.1504 view top 100 |
Estimated hesitant or unsure | estimated_hesitant_or_unsure | number | Estimate of percentage of adults who describe themselves as “unsure”, “probably not”, or “definitely not” going to get a COVID-19 vaccine once one is available to them, based on national survey data. | 0.1901 0.2068 0.1883 0.2037 0.2059 view top 100 |
Estimated strongly hesitant | estimated_strongly_hesitant | number | Estimate of percentage of adults who describe themselves as “definitely not” going to get a COVID-19 vaccine once one is available to them, based on national survey data. | 0.0919 0.0822 0.0824 0.086 0.0903 view top 100 |
Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) | social_vulnerability_index | number | SVI values range from 0 (least vulnerable) to 1 (most vulnerable). | 0.37 0.34 0.54 0.79 0.87 view top 100 |
SVI Category | svi_category | text | SVI categorized as follows: Very Low (0.0-0.19), Low (0.20-0.39); Moderate (0.40-0.59); High (0.60-0.79); Very High (0.80-1.0) | Very High Vulnerability Low Vulnerability High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Very Low Vulnerability view top 100 |
CVAC level of concern for vaccination rollout | ability_to_handle_a_covid | number | CVAC Index values range from 0 (lowest concern) to 1 (highest concern) | 0.74 0.62 0.18 0.43 0.57 view top 100 |
CVAC Level Of Concern | cvac_category | text | CVAC categorized as follows: Very Low (0.0-0.19), Low (0.20-0.39); Moderate (0.40-0.59); High (0.60-0.79); Very High (0.80-1.0) | Very High Concern Very Low Concern Low Concern Moderate Concern High Concern view top 100 |
Percent adults fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (as of 6/10/21) | percent_adults_fully | number | Percent of Adults fully vaccinated against COVID-19 | 0.388 0.353 0.453 0.416 0.516 view top 100 |
Percent Hispanic | percent_hispanic | number | Percent of county population that is Hispanic | 0 0.0204 0.0231 0.0201 0.0167 view top 100 |
Percent non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native | percent_non_hispanic_american | number | Percent of county population that is non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native | 0 0.0017 0.0015 0.0013 0.0014 view top 100 |
Percent non-Hispanic Asian | percent_non_hispanic_asian | number | Percent of county population that is non-Hispanic Asian | 0 0.0008 0.0043 0.0029 0.0056 view top 100 |
Percent non-Hispanic Black | percent_non_hispanic_black | number | Percent of county population that is non-Hispanic Black | 0 0.0049 0.004 0.0041 0.0058 view top 100 |
Percent non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | percent_non_hispanic_native | number | Percent of county population that is non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0 0.0001 0.0002 0.0004 0.0003 view top 100 |
Percent non-Hispanic White | percent_non_hispanic_white | number | Percent of county population that is non-Hispanic White | 0.9412 0.9452 0.9392 0.8544 0.9426 view top 100 |
Geographical Point | geographical_point | point | {"coordinates":[-99.317341,31.447238],"type":"Point"} {"coordinates":[-83.426574,32.638481],"type":"Point"} {"coordinates":[-78.666382,37.510861],"type":"Point"} {"coordinates":[-85.290484,37.526683],"type":"Point"} {"coordinates":[-92.477244,38.3675],"type":"Point"} view top 100 | |
State Code | state_code | text | TX GA VA KY MO view top 100 | |
County Boundary | county_boundary | multipolygon | view top 100 | |
State Boundary | state_boundary | multipolygon | view top 100 |