The land area of Jennings County, IN was 377 in 2018. The land area of Grant County, KY was 258 in 2018.
Land Area
Water Area
Land area is a measurement providing the size, in square miles, of the land portions of geographic entities for which the Census Bureau tabulates and disseminates data. Area is calculated from the specific boundary recorded for each entity in the Census Bureau's geographic database. Land area is based on current information in the TIGER® data base, calculated for use with Census 2010.
Water Area figures include inland, coastal, Great Lakes, and territorial sea water. Inland water consists of any lake, reservoir, pond, or similar body of water that is recorded in the Census Bureau's geographic database. It also includes any river, creek, canal, stream, or similar feature that is recorded in that database as a two- dimensional feature (rather than as a single line). The portions of the oceans and related large embayments (such as Chesapeake Bay and Puget Sound), the Gulf of Mexico, and the Caribbean Sea that belong to the United States and its territories are classified as coastal and territorial waters; the Great Lakes are treated as a separate water entity. Rivers and bays that empty into these bodies of water are treated as inland water from the point beyond which they are narrower than 1 nautical mile across. Identification of land and inland, coastal, territorial, and Great Lakes waters is for data presentation purposes only and does not necessarily reflect their legal definitions.
Above charts are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey | ODN Dataset | API -
Geographic and Area Datasets Involving Jennings County, IN or Grant County, KY
- API
SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities
data.ny.gov | Last Updated 2024-08-12T19:36:08.000ZThe SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP), which is administered by the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department), regulates stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from a point source. The MSGP covers thirty one different industrial sectors which include activities such as mining, land transportation, and scrap recycling. The dataset displays information on facilities that have active MSGP coverage in New York State. Information included in the data set include the facility’s name, address, contact information, industrial sector(s), discharging waterbody, and location of the facility’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. For more information, please go to http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/62803.html.
- API
Franchise - Water
internal.open.piercecountywa.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-25T00:54:32.000ZPolygons delineating the water franchise areas in Pierce County. The franchise granted allows the holder of the franchise to operate in County Right-of-Ways, though it is possible that the holder of the franchise does not provide service in all of their franchise area. This data was updated in 2008 where known changes had occurred but should be used with caution. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/GISmetadata/pdbpubw_franchise_water.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).
- API
2020 Census Tracts (water areas included)
data.cityofnewyork.us | Last Updated 2024-08-19T04:44:17.000Z2020 Census Tracts (water areas included) from the US Census for New York City. These boundary files are derived from the US Census Bureau's TIGER data products and have been geographically modified to fit the New York City base map. All previously released versions of this data are available at <a href="https://www.nyc.gov/site/planning/data-maps/open-data/bytes-archive.page?sorts%5Byear%5D=0">BYTES of the BIG APPLE- Archive</a>.
- API
Public Utility Commission of Texas - Water and Sewer Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs)
data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-04T14:33:22.000ZA water and sewer Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) is a retail public utility owned by an individual, partnership, corporation or homeowners association.
- API
RICAPS Water Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Emissions
datahub.smcgov.org | Last Updated 2023-05-26T00:33:05.000ZData by city showing energy contribution to greenhouse gas emissions in the County. This data is part of the Regionally Integrated Climate Action Planning Suite (RICAPS) program. Each city in San Mateo County has the opportunity to develop its own Climate Action Plan (CAP) using tools developed by C/CAG in conjunction with DNV KEMA https://www.dnvgl.com/ and Hara. http://www.verisae.com/default.aspx. This project was funded by grants from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Climate Action Plans developed from these tools will meet BAAQMD's California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for a Qualified Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy. For more information, please see the RICAPS site: http://www.smcenergywatch.com/progress_report.html
- API
DEC Land Acquisition Annual Reports: Beginning 1990
data.ny.gov | Last Updated 2023-07-11T15:19:46.000ZLand acquisition projects completed by DEC reported since the institution of the required Annual Land Acquisition Report in ECL § 49-0213.
- API
PLN_ASBS
data.smcgov.org | Last Updated 2024-04-10T19:13:11.000ZBoundary of the James V. Fitzgerald Area of Special Biological Significance (Fitzgerald ASBS). The Fitzgerald ASBS. In June 2011, San Mateo County began working on the Fitzgerald ASBS Pollution Reduction Program http://smchealth.org/asbs to comply with the Water Board’s General Exception to the Ocean Plan with Special Protections. The program is led by the Department of Public Works in collaboration with the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District and the San Francisco Estuary Institute. The program is funded in part by a Proposition 84 grant from the State Water Resources Control Board and involves the implementation of targeted stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs), water quality studies and BMP effectiveness monitoring within the ASBS watershed boundary, along with education and outreach. The program’s goal is to improve water quality and protect beneficial uses of the Fitzgerald ASBS and additionally assist in the County’s compliance with the ASBS stormwater regulations. More information can be found on the Planning and Building Department's site: http://planning.smcgov.org/san-mateo-county-fitzgerald-asbs-pollution-reduction-program
- API
Franchise - Water
open.piercecountywa.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-25T00:17:02.000ZPolygons delineating the water franchise areas in Pierce County. The franchise granted allows the holder of the franchise to operate in County Right-of-Ways, though it is possible that the holder of the franchise does not provide service in all of their franchise area. This data was updated in 2008 where known changes had occurred but should be used with caution. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/GISmetadata/pdbpubw_franchise_water.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).
- API
Land Use_data
opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2024-04-10T19:40:16.000ZThis dataset combines the work of several different projects to create a seamless data set for the contiguous United States. Data from four regional Gap Analysis Projects and the LANDFIRE project were combined to make this dataset. In the Northwestern United States (Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Washington and Wyoming) data in this map came from the Northwest Gap Analysis Project. In the Southwestern United States (Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) data used in this map came from the Southwest Gap Analysis Project. The data for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia came from the Southeast Gap Analysis Project and the California data was generated by the updated California Gap land cover project. The Hawaii Gap Analysis project provided the data for Hawaii. In areas of the county (central U.S., Northeast, Alaska) that have not yet been covered by a regional Gap Analysis Project, data from the Landfire project was used. Similarities in the methods used by these projects made possible the combining of the data they derived into one seamless coverage. They all used multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+) from 1999-2001 in conjunction with digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform) to model natural and semi-natural vegetation. Vegetation classes were drawn from NatureServe’s Ecological System Classification (Comer et al. 2003) or classes developed by the Hawaii Gap project. Additionally, all of the projects included land use classes that were employed to describe areas where natural vegetation has been altered. In many areas of the country these classes were derived from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). For the majority of classes and, in most areas of the country, a decision tree classifier was used to discriminate ecological system types. In some areas of the country, more manual techniques were used to discriminate small patch systems and systems not distinguishable through topography. The data contains multiple levels of thematic detail. At the most detailed level natural vegetation is represented by NatureServe’s Ecological System classification (or in Hawaii the Hawaii GAP classification). These most detailed classifications have been crosswalked to the five highest levels of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC), Class, Subclass, Formation, Division and Macrogroup. This crosswalk allows users to display and analyze the data at different levels of thematic resolution. Developed areas, or areas dominated by introduced species, timber harvest, or water are represented by other classes, collectively refered to as land use classes; these land use classes occur at each of the thematic levels. Six layer files are included in the download packages to assist the user in displaying the data at each of the Thematic levels in ArcGIS.
- API
Community Survey: 2023 Survey Data
data.bloomington.in.gov | Last Updated 2023-08-03T19:34:23.000ZThe City of Bloomington contracted with National Research Center, Inc. to conduct the 2023 Bloomington Community Survey. This is the fourth time a scientific citywide survey has been completed covering resident opinions on service delivery satisfaction by the City of Bloomington and quality of life issues. <br> The 2023 survey received responses from 367 households (from a scientific sample of 3,000) and an additional 557 residents completed the opt-in survey. Read more at: <a href="https://bton.in/LWVOR">bton.in/LWVOR</a>.