The percent without health insurance of Umatilla County, OR was 16.80% for 18 to 64, all races, both sexes and all income levels in 2014. The percent without health insurance of Grant County, WA was 21.20% for 18 to 64, all races, both sexes and all income levels in 2014.

Percent Uninsured

Percent Uninsured by Income Level

Percent Uninsured by Race

The Small Area Health Insurance Estimate (SAHIE) estimates health insurance coverage from the American Community Survey (ACS).

Above charts are based on data from the Small Area Health Insurance Estimate | ODN Dataset | API - Notes:

1. ODN datasets and APIs are subject to change and may differ in format from the original source data in order to provide a user-friendly experience on this site.

2. To build your own apps using this data, see the ODN Dataset and API links.

3. If you use this derived data in an app, we ask that you provide a link somewhere in your applications to the Open Data Network with a citation that states: "Data for this application was provided by the Open Data Network" where "Open Data Network" links to http://opendatanetwork.com. Where an application has a region specific module, we ask that you add an additional line that states: "Data about REGIONX was provided by the Open Data Network." where REGIONX is an HREF with a name for a geographical region like "Seattle, WA" and the link points to this page URL, e.g. http://opendatanetwork.com/region/1600000US5363000/Seattle_WA

Health and Health Insurance Datasets Involving Umatilla County, OR or Grant County, WA

  • API

    Pierce County, WA -- COVID Risk Index Score

    internal.open.piercecountywa.gov | Last Updated 2020-05-26T22:54:57.000Z

    Population over 60 (S0101), Women Who Had a Birth in the Past 12 Months (B13002), Below Poverty Level (B17015), No Health Insurance (B27001), Household Receiving SNAP Assistance (S2201), No Internet Access (B28002), Total Population (B01003) and Language at Home (C16001)

  • API

    Education, Health, And Transportation Demographics

    data.orcities.org | Last Updated 2017-01-06T16:41:02.000Z

    Data from the American Community Survey 2014 on all LOC member cities. This dataset includes select information for education, health and transportation statistics.

  • API

    WA-APCD Quality and Cost Summary Report: County Cost

    data.wa.gov | Last Updated 2018-09-13T22:59:19.000Z

    WA-APCD - Washington All-Payer Claims Database The WA-APCD is the state’s most complete source of health care eligibility, medical claims, pharmacy claims, and dental claims insurance data. It contains claims from more than 50 data suppliers, spanning commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare managed care. The WA-APCD has historical claims data for five years (2013-2017), with ongoing refreshes scheduled quarterly. Workers' compensation data from the Washington Department of Labor & Industries will be added in fall 2018. Download the attachment for the data dictionary and more information about WA-APCD and the data.

  • API

    Drug and Alcohol Treatment Facilities May 2018 County Drug and Alcohol Programs

    data.pa.gov | Last Updated 2022-10-17T19:15:44.000Z

    This dataset reports the name, street address, city, county, zip code, telephone number, latitude, and longitude of Pennsylvania Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs (DDAP) drug and alcohol treatment facilities in Pennsylvania as of May 2018. The primary difference between the three types of treatment facilities is their funding. Centers of Excellence (COEs) were grant funded by the Department of Human Services, PacMATs were grant funded by the Department of Health, and all other facilities are funded by either billing insurance or billing the county in the case of uninsured clients. Programmatically, COEs differ from the other types because they are designed to serve as “health homes” for individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). This means that the care coordination staff at the COE is charged with coordinating all kinds of health care (physical and behavioral health) as well as recovery support services. They do this by developing hub-and-spoke networks with other healthcare providers and other sources for recovery supports, such as housing, transportation, education and training, etc. All COEs are required to accept Medicaid. PacMATs also operate in a hub-and-spoke model, but it is different from COEs. PacMATs endeavor to coordinate the provision of Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) by identifying a core hub of physicians in a health system that work with other providers in the health system (spokes) to train them about the safe and effective provision of MAT so that there are more providers in a health system that are able to confidently prescribe various forms of MAT. I do not know whether all PacMATs are required to accept Medicaid as a term of their receipt of the grant, but I do know that all currently designated PacMATs are health systems that do accept Medicaid. PacMAT services have been advertised as being available to all people regardless of insurance type, so I assume this means they are required to serve Medicaid clients, commercially insured clients, and uninsured clients. In the PacMAT program the Hub is supported right now by grant funding (in the future funding such as a per patient/per month capitated rate) and the spokes bill insurance (both Medicaid and Commercial) DDAP facilities may also be designated as COEs and/or PacMATs. If they are, it means they applied for a specific grant fund and have committed to carrying out the activities of the grant described above. To be clear, DDAP does not run any treatment facilities; they license them. These can be MAT providers such as methadone clinics, providers of outpatient levels of care (i.e., more traditional drug and alcohol counseling services) or inpatient levels of care, such as residential rehabilitation programs. Every facility is different in terms of the menu of services it provides. Every facility also gets to decide what forms of payment they will accept. Many accept Medicaid, but not all do. Some only accept private commercial insurance. Some accept payment from the county on behalf of uninsured clients. And some charge their clients cash for services.

  • API

    Health Insurance Coverage by County

    internal.open.piercecountywa.gov | Last Updated 2024-06-13T18:07:54.000Z

    Health insurance coverage data from ACS-1 (DP03_0095E, DP03_0096E, DP03_0096PE).

  • API

    MCG Group Health Plan Rates

    data.montgomerycountymd.gov | Last Updated 2023-04-04T00:00:46.000Z

    Montgomery County offers medical, prescription, vision and dental plans for our employees, their families and their partners. Employees can choose between two Point-of-Service (POS) plans with CareFirst Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) and two Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO’s) with United HealthCare and Kaiser; two prescription plans with Caremark; National Vision Administrators (NVA) plan and two PPO and DHMO dental plans with United Concordia. The dataset contains all available plan rates, provider websites and contact numbers. In addition, this information is also available on the Office of Human Resources (OHR) website at https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/HR/Benefits/EmployeeMedical.html#1 Update Frequency : Annually

  • API

    Fiscal Year 2015 County Executive Recommended Operating Budget – Internal Service Funds

    data.montgomerycountymd.gov | Last Updated 2022-08-01T19:54:05.000Z

    This dataset includes the Internal Service Fund data included in the annual operating budget. Internal Service Funds (ISF) are proprietary funds used to record activity (primarily goods and services) provided by one department to other departments of the County government on a cost-reimbursable basis. The County uses this type of fund to account for Motor Pool, Central Duplicating, Liability and Property Coverage Self-Insurance, and Employee Health Benefits Self-Insurance. Update Frequency: Annually

  • API

    Number Of People Without Health Insurance All States 2005-2012

    opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-04-19T06:44:33.000Z

    Number Of People Without Health Insurance All States 2005-2012

  • API

    FY14 Budget-Internal Service Funds

    data.montgomerycountymd.gov | Last Updated 2022-08-12T16:42:00.000Z

    This dataset includes the Internal Service Fund data included in the annual operating budget. Internal Service Funds (ISF) are proprietary funds used to record activity (primarily goods and services) provided by one department to other departments of the County government on a cost-reimbursable basis. The County uses this type of fund to account for Motor Pool, Central Duplicating, Liability and Property Coverage Self-Insurance, and Employee Health Benefits Self-Insurance. Update Frequency: Annual

  • API

    Fiscal Year 2013 Budget - Internal Service Funds

    data.montgomerycountymd.gov | Last Updated 2022-08-12T16:41:42.000Z

    This dataset includes the Internal Service Fund data included in the annual operating budget. Internal Service Funds (ISF) are proprietary funds used to record activity (primarily goods and services) provided by one department to other departments of the County government on a cost-reimbursable basis. The County uses this type of fund to account for Motor Pool, Central Duplicating, Liability and Property Coverage Self-Insurance, and Employee Health Benefits Self-Insurance. Update Frequency: Annual