The population density of Mobile, AL was 1,377 in 2018.

Population Density

Population Density is computed by dividing the total population by Land Area Per Square Mile.

Above charts are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey | ODN Dataset | API - Notes:

1. ODN datasets and APIs are subject to change and may differ in format from the original source data in order to provide a user-friendly experience on this site.

2. To build your own apps using this data, see the ODN Dataset and API links.

3. If you use this derived data in an app, we ask that you provide a link somewhere in your applications to the Open Data Network with a citation that states: "Data for this application was provided by the Open Data Network" where "Open Data Network" links to http://opendatanetwork.com. Where an application has a region specific module, we ask that you add an additional line that states: "Data about REGIONX was provided by the Open Data Network." where REGIONX is an HREF with a name for a geographical region like "Seattle, WA" and the link points to this page URL, e.g. http://opendatanetwork.com/region/1600000US5363000/Seattle_WA

Geographic and Population Datasets Involving Mobile, AL

  • API

    Internet Master Plan: Adoption and Infrastructure Data by Neighborhood

    data.cityofnewyork.us | Last Updated 2022-09-23T19:23:10.000Z

    Key indicators of broadband adoption, service and infrastructure in New York City.</p> <b>Data Limitations:</b> Data accuracy is limited as of the date of publication and by the methodology and accuracy of the original sources. The City shall not be liable for any costs related to, or in reliance of, the data contained in these datasets.

  • API

    Broadband Adoption Basic Indicators

    data.cityofnewyork.us | Last Updated 2022-09-23T19:23:10.000Z

    Key indicators of broadband adoption, service and infrastructure in New York City by NTA.

  • API

    Mobility Trends County Modeling Dataset

    datahub.transportation.gov | Last Updated 2024-04-17T20:15:17.000Z

    The Mobility Trends County Modeling dataset consists of the accumulation of the three performance metrics: VMT, GHG, and TMS, alongside each of the trend indicators: GDP, Population, Lane Miles, Unemployment Rate, Charging Stations, Telework, Unlinked Passenger Trips, E-commerce, Population Density, and on-demand service revenue. The goal of Mobility Trends and Future Demand research project is to enhance FHWA’s empirical understanding of the impact of trends on travel behavior and transportation demand, and ultimately system performance and the user experience. At the core of this research project is the identification and analysis of trends to support a variety of modeling, forecasting, and ‘what if’ projections to support policy and decision making.

  • API

    Final Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) 2023

    data.ny.gov | Last Updated 2023-10-11T02:17:42.000Z

    The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) directs the Climate Justice Working Group (CJWG) to establish criteria for defining disadvantaged communities. This dataset identifies areas throughout the State that meet the final disadvantaged community definition as voted on by the Climate Justice Working Group. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, accelerate economic growth, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA’s programs, visit nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.

  • API

    E-Rate Supplemental Entity Information

    datahub.usac.org | Last Updated 2024-05-14T08:47:25.000Z

    This dataset contains E-Rate Productivity Center (EPC) information about schools, libraries, school districts, library systems, consortia, and non-instructional facilities (NIFs). For Annexes information, please refer to the "E-Rate Supplemental Entity Information: Annexes" dataset.

  • API

    Total Population

    data.grandrapidsmi.gov | Last Updated 2024-05-10T22:32:09.000Z

    GR Vital Streets: Equity & Prioritization analysisAnalysis OVERVIEWA multi-variable analysis of demographic and geographic assets was conducted to aid the Vital Streets program in identifying target areas to prioritize for vital streets funding. This analysis in particular focuses on equity factors across the City of Grand Rapids along with geographic representation across different wards. The analysis is broken into two components:Demographic Need– This set of factors reflects equity and need considerations based on demographic characteristics and adjusted based on the overall population density of each census block.Connection Opportunity– Factors reflect desired destinations and areas of opportunity based on a spectrum of data inputs – including gaps in existing physical facilities and infrastructure, jobs, and transit connectivity.APPROACHEach of the analysis factors are aggregated into the 2010 census block level. The source for each factor and methods of aggregation are described below in the DATA LAYERS section.Each factor was generalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution (20% increments in values across the scores) unless otherwise noted below.Factors within each analysis component (Demographic Need and Connectivity Opportunity) were combined with equal weighting (calculation of mean score) to generate a component score. The Demographic Need score was filtered based on the census block's population density score such that less dense census blocks would receive a lower score relative to denser census blocks with the same Demographic need score. The following formulas were used for calculating these scores:Demographic Need: (([MedIncS] + [Ov65DenS] + [HHPovS] + [HHDisabS] + [NoWhiteS] + [Youth18S])/6)/(6- [PopDensS])Connection Opportunity: ([CommDenS]+ [JobDenS]+[ParkAccS]+[TransitS]+ [BikeConS]+ [BPCrashS]+ [TreeCanS]+ [SidewalkS])/8The two component scores were each normalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution.The resulting component scores were combined into an overall score for each Census Block by adding the two values together, resulting in a 2-10 score range for each Census block. Data DescriptionDemographic NeedThese factors relate to areas of the city where there may be a heightened need for projects to occur in order to support neighborhood stability, and address equity considerations.The data for the Demographic Need component was taken directly from Census 2010 and American Community Survey (ACS) data from 2015. Median Income [MedInc]2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataBlock-group level was transferred into the census block level data using a spatial join.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Lower income prioritized. [MedIncS]Density of total population in Senior age brackets [Ov65Den]2010 Census, block level data, 65-years and olderThe density of seniors within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of seniors by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Ov65DenS]Density of total population in under 18 age brackets[Youth18]2010 Census, block level data, quantiles scoringThe density of youth within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of youths by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Youth18S]Density of households with a person with a disability[HHDisab] 2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataPercentage values were multiplied against the total household data to determine an estimated number of households with disabilities in each census block-group.Block-group level data was transferred into census block level data using a spatial join.The density of households with disabilities within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of households with disabilities by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified b

  • API

    % over 65 years old

    data.grandrapidsmi.gov | Last Updated 2024-05-10T22:35:33.000Z

    GR Vital Streets: Equity & Prioritization analysisAnalysis OVERVIEWA multi-variable analysis of demographic and geographic assets was conducted to aid the Vital Streets program in identifying target areas to prioritize for vital streets funding. This analysis in particular focuses on equity factors across the City of Grand Rapids along with geographic representation across different wards. The analysis is broken into two components:Demographic Need– This set of factors reflects equity and need considerations based on demographic characteristics and adjusted based on the overall population density of each census block.Connection Opportunity– Factors reflect desired destinations and areas of opportunity based on a spectrum of data inputs – including gaps in existing physical facilities and infrastructure, jobs, and transit connectivity.APPROACHEach of the analysis factors are aggregated into the 2010 census block level. The source for each factor and methods of aggregation are described below in the DATA LAYERS section.Each factor was generalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution (20% increments in values across the scores) unless otherwise noted below.Factors within each analysis component (Demographic Need and Connectivity Opportunity) were combined with equal weighting (calculation of mean score) to generate a component score. The Demographic Need score was filtered based on the census block's population density score such that less dense census blocks would receive a lower score relative to denser census blocks with the same Demographic need score. The following formulas were used for calculating these scores:Demographic Need: (([MedIncS] + [Ov65DenS] + [HHPovS] + [HHDisabS] + [NoWhiteS] + [Youth18S])/6)/(6- [PopDensS])Connection Opportunity: ([CommDenS]+ [JobDenS]+[ParkAccS]+[TransitS]+ [BikeConS]+ [BPCrashS]+ [TreeCanS]+ [SidewalkS])/8The two component scores were each normalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution.The resulting component scores were combined into an overall score for each Census Block by adding the two values together, resulting in a 2-10 score range for each Census block. Data DescriptionDemographic NeedThese factors relate to areas of the city where there may be a heightened need for projects to occur in order to support neighborhood stability, and address equity considerations.The data for the Demographic Need component was taken directly from Census 2010 and American Community Survey (ACS) data from 2015. Median Income [MedInc]2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataBlock-group level was transferred into the census block level data using a spatial join.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Lower income prioritized. [MedIncS]Density of total population in Senior age brackets [Ov65Den]2010 Census, block level data, 65-years and olderThe density of seniors within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of seniors by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Ov65DenS]Density of total population in under 18 age brackets[Youth18]2010 Census, block level data, quantiles scoringThe density of youth within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of youths by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Youth18S]Density of households with a person with a disability[HHDisab] 2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataPercentage values were multiplied against the total household data to determine an estimated number of households with disabilities in each census block-group.Block-group level data was transferred into census block level data using a spatial join.The density of households with disabilities within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of households with disabilities by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified b

  • API

    % under 18 years old

    data.grandrapidsmi.gov | Last Updated 2024-05-10T23:47:56.000Z

    GR Vital Streets: Equity & Prioritization analysisAnalysis OVERVIEWA multi-variable analysis of demographic and geographic assets was conducted to aid the Vital Streets program in identifying target areas to prioritize for vital streets funding. This analysis in particular focuses on equity factors across the City of Grand Rapids along with geographic representation across different wards. The analysis is broken into two components:Demographic Need– This set of factors reflects equity and need considerations based on demographic characteristics and adjusted based on the overall population density of each census block.Connection Opportunity– Factors reflect desired destinations and areas of opportunity based on a spectrum of data inputs – including gaps in existing physical facilities and infrastructure, jobs, and transit connectivity.APPROACHEach of the analysis factors are aggregated into the 2010 census block level. The source for each factor and methods of aggregation are described below in the DATA LAYERS section.Each factor was generalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution (20% increments in values across the scores) unless otherwise noted below.Factors within each analysis component (Demographic Need and Connectivity Opportunity) were combined with equal weighting (calculation of mean score) to generate a component score. The Demographic Need score was filtered based on the census block's population density score such that less dense census blocks would receive a lower score relative to denser census blocks with the same Demographic need score. The following formulas were used for calculating these scores:Demographic Need: (([MedIncS] + [Ov65DenS] + [HHPovS] + [HHDisabS] + [NoWhiteS] + [Youth18S])/6)/(6- [PopDensS])Connection Opportunity: ([CommDenS]+ [JobDenS]+[ParkAccS]+[TransitS]+ [BikeConS]+ [BPCrashS]+ [TreeCanS]+ [SidewalkS])/8The two component scores were each normalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution.The resulting component scores were combined into an overall score for each Census Block by adding the two values together, resulting in a 2-10 score range for each Census block. Data DescriptionDemographic NeedThese factors relate to areas of the city where there may be a heightened need for projects to occur in order to support neighborhood stability, and address equity considerations.The data for the Demographic Need component was taken directly from Census 2010 and American Community Survey (ACS) data from 2015. Median Income [MedInc]2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataBlock-group level was transferred into the census block level data using a spatial join.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Lower income prioritized. [MedIncS]Density of total population in Senior age brackets [Ov65Den]2010 Census, block level data, 65-years and olderThe density of seniors within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of seniors by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Ov65DenS]Density of total population in under 18 age brackets[Youth18]2010 Census, block level data, quantiles scoringThe density of youth within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of youths by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Youth18S]Density of households with a person with a disability[HHDisab] 2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataPercentage values were multiplied against the total household data to determine an estimated number of households with disabilities in each census block-group.Block-group level data was transferred into census block level data using a spatial join.The density of households with disabilities within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of households with disabilities by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified b

  • API

    NYC Building Energy and Water Data Disclosure for Local Law 84 (2023-Present)

    data.cityofnewyork.us | Last Updated 2023-08-30T18:55:16.000Z

    Local Law 84 of 2009 (LL84) requires annual energy and water benchmarking data to be submitted by owners of buildings with more than 50,000 square feet. This data is collected via the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) <a href="https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/tools-and-resources/portfolio-manager-0">Portfolio Manager website</a> Each property is identified by it's EPA assigned property ID, and can contain one or more tax lots identified by one or more BBLs (Borough, Block, Lot) or one or more buildings identified by one or more building identification numbers (BIN) Please visit <a href="https://www1.nyc.gov/site/buildings/codes/benchmarking.page">DOB's Benchmarking and Energy Efficiency Rating page</a> for additional information.

  • API

    % Non-white

    data.grandrapidsmi.gov | Last Updated 2024-05-12T21:39:50.000Z

    GR Vital Streets: Equity & Prioritization analysisAnalysis OVERVIEWA multi-variable analysis of demographic and geographic assets was conducted to aid the Vital Streets program in identifying target areas to prioritize for vital streets funding. This analysis in particular focuses on equity factors across the City of Grand Rapids along with geographic representation across different wards. The analysis is broken into two components:Demographic Need– This set of factors reflects equity and need considerations based on demographic characteristics and adjusted based on the overall population density of each census block.Connection Opportunity– Factors reflect desired destinations and areas of opportunity based on a spectrum of data inputs – including gaps in existing physical facilities and infrastructure, jobs, and transit connectivity.APPROACHEach of the analysis factors are aggregated into the 2010 census block level. The source for each factor and methods of aggregation are described below in the DATA LAYERS section.Each factor was generalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution (20% increments in values across the scores) unless otherwise noted below.Factors within each analysis component (Demographic Need and Connectivity Opportunity) were combined with equal weighting (calculation of mean score) to generate a component score. The Demographic Need score was filtered based on the census block's population density score such that less dense census blocks would receive a lower score relative to denser census blocks with the same Demographic need score. The following formulas were used for calculating these scores:Demographic Need: (([MedIncS] + [Ov65DenS] + [HHPovS] + [HHDisabS] + [NoWhiteS] + [Youth18S])/6)/(6- [PopDensS])Connection Opportunity: ([CommDenS]+ [JobDenS]+[ParkAccS]+[TransitS]+ [BikeConS]+ [BPCrashS]+ [TreeCanS]+ [SidewalkS])/8The two component scores were each normalized into a 1-5 score based on a quantile distribution.The resulting component scores were combined into an overall score for each Census Block by adding the two values together, resulting in a 2-10 score range for each Census block. Data DescriptionDemographic NeedThese factors relate to areas of the city where there may be a heightened need for projects to occur in order to support neighborhood stability, and address equity considerations.The data for the Demographic Need component was taken directly from Census 2010 and American Community Survey (ACS) data from 2015. Median Income [MedInc]2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataBlock-group level was transferred into the census block level data using a spatial join.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Lower income prioritized. [MedIncS]Density of total population in Senior age brackets [Ov65Den]2010 Census, block level data, 65-years and olderThe density of seniors within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of seniors by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Ov65DenS]Density of total population in under 18 age brackets[Youth18]2010 Census, block level data, quantiles scoringThe density of youth within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of youths by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified based on five quantile breaks. Higher density prioritized [Youth18S]Density of households with a person with a disability[HHDisab] 2015 American Communities Survey, block-group level dataPercentage values were multiplied against the total household data to determine an estimated number of households with disabilities in each census block-group.Block-group level data was transferred into census block level data using a spatial join.The density of households with disabilities within each census block was calculated by dividing the total number of households with disabilities by the acreage of the census block.1-5 scores classified b