The land area of Battle Creek, MI was 43 in 2018.
Land Area
Water Area
Land area is a measurement providing the size, in square miles, of the land portions of geographic entities for which the Census Bureau tabulates and disseminates data. Area is calculated from the specific boundary recorded for each entity in the Census Bureau's geographic database. Land area is based on current information in the TIGER® data base, calculated for use with Census 2010.
Water Area figures include inland, coastal, Great Lakes, and territorial sea water. Inland water consists of any lake, reservoir, pond, or similar body of water that is recorded in the Census Bureau's geographic database. It also includes any river, creek, canal, stream, or similar feature that is recorded in that database as a two- dimensional feature (rather than as a single line). The portions of the oceans and related large embayments (such as Chesapeake Bay and Puget Sound), the Gulf of Mexico, and the Caribbean Sea that belong to the United States and its territories are classified as coastal and territorial waters; the Great Lakes are treated as a separate water entity. Rivers and bays that empty into these bodies of water are treated as inland water from the point beyond which they are narrower than 1 nautical mile across. Identification of land and inland, coastal, territorial, and Great Lakes waters is for data presentation purposes only and does not necessarily reflect their legal definitions.
Above charts are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey | ODN Dataset | API -
Geographic and Area Datasets Involving Battle Creek, MI
- API
Water Quality Sampling Data
datahub.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-20T08:29:22.000ZData collected to assess water quality conditions in the natural creeks, aquifers and lakes in the Austin area. This is raw data, provided directly from our Water Resources Monitoring database (WRM) and should be considered provisional. Data may or may not have been reviewed by project staff. A map of site locations can be found by searching for LOCATION.WRM_SAMPLE_SITES; you may then use those WRM_SITE_IDs to filter in this dataset using the field SAMPLE_SITE_NO.
- API
Beach E. coli Predictions
data.cityofchicago.org | Last Updated 2024-09-03T04:55:05.000ZThe Chicago Park District issues swim advisories at beaches along Chicago's Lake Michigan lakefront based on E. coli levels. This dataset shows predicted E. coli levels based on an experimental analytical modeling approach.
- API
Beach and Creek Monitoring Results
datahub.smcgov.org | Last Updated 2023-07-01T01:00:14.000ZWater samples from natural recreational waters in San Mateo County are sampled each week for concentrations of indicator bacteria including E. Coli, Enterococcus, and Coliform bacteria. If concentrations of indicator bacteria exceed State or County standards, the area is posted to warn users that they may become ill if they engage in water contact activities in the posted area. More information about results and testing can be found on the San Mateo County Health System site: http://smchealth.org/environ/beaches This dataset contains readings from January, 2012 to the present and is updated weekly.
- API
Deep and/or Fast Flowing Floodway
internal.open.piercecountywa.gov | Last Updated 2024-07-05T17:00:54.000ZNorthwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc (NHC) was contracted by Pierce County Surface Water Management to develop a map of the Deep and Fast Flowing (DFF) regulated Floodway in Pierce County because this area is not mapped by FEMA and it is not intuitive where this floodway is located within the floodplain. NHC wrote the metadata. Deep and/or fast-flowing (DFF) floodway boundary for Puyallup, Carbon, Mashell, and White Rivers, South Prairie Creek, Fennel Creek, Wapato Creek, Canyon Creek, Clarks Creek, Clear Creek, Diru Creek, Rody Creek, Clover Creek, Spanaway Creek, Morey Creek, Crescent Creek, Artondale Creek, Lacamas Creek, and Swan Creek. DFF floodway determined only for detailed study areas from new (2001-2007) model studies. For additional information on this theme Please contact Dennis Dixon at 253-798-3696 for the DFF Report.pdf. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/GISmetadata/pdbswm_regulated_dff_floodway.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).
- API
Water Quality
data.kingcounty.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-17T00:24:35.000ZPrior to downloading data, please download the <b> <a href="https://data.kingcounty.gov/api/views/vwmt-pvjw/files/74efd236-ffa8-4dee-aac1-0188e110dd1c?download=true&filename=DataReadMeFile_WQ.docx">README</a></b> file. This dataset contains water quality samples collected from Puget Sound, lakes, and streams in the region which can be filtered by "Site Type" and "Area". To see where water quality samples are collected, see the <b><a href="https://data.kingcounty.gov/dataset/WLRD-Sites/wbhs-bbzf">WLRD Water Quality Collection Sites</a></b> dataset.
- API
Wastewater Treatment Plants Effluent Water Quality
data.calgary.ca | Last Updated 2024-09-02T17:33:49.000ZThis dataset contains results from the City of Calgary's Wastewater Treatment Plants that are reported monthly to Alberta Environment and Protected Areas. Results include laboratory and flow data for the wastewater treatment plants’ treated effluents, 2007 to present. Sampling locations have been added, removed, or modified over time. All laboratory results have been determined from the daily 24-hour composite samples, with the exception of Fecal Coliforms which are determined from the grab sampling. The City of Calgary uses approved and documented analytical testing methodologies, and the City of Calgary laboratory is accredited to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard. Quality Assurance programs track and ensure consistent laboratory performance. Changes in data over time, such as method detection limits, accredited testing parameters, and formatting are the result of newer analytical techniques and improved data quality standards.
- API
Austin Watershed Regulation Areas
datahub.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2024-08-03T19:38:18.000ZThis layer represents the watershed regulation areas within the jurisdictional extent of the City of Austin
- API
Waterbodies
data.bloomington.in.gov | Last Updated 2023-12-15T16:59:13.000Z<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This map data layer represents the linear hydrology features for the City of Bloomington, Indiana. This includes creeks, streams, lake shorelines, open channels, and detention pond boundary line features.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
- API
Beach Lab Data
data.cityofchicago.org | Last Updated 2024-09-04T19:00:17.000ZThe Chicago Park District collects and analyzes water samples from beaches along Chicago’s Lake Michigan lakefront. The Chicago Park District partners with the University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Public Health Laboratory to analyze water samples using a new DNA testing method called Rapid Testing Method (qPCR analysis) which tests for Enterococci in order to monitor swimming safety. The rapid testing method (qPCR analysis) is a new method that measures levels of pathogenic DNA in beach water. Unlike the culture based test that requires up to 24 hours of processing, the new rapid testing method requires a 4-5 hours for results. The Chicago Park District can use results of the rapid test to notify the public when levels exceed UPEPA recommended levels, which is 1000* CCE. When DNA bacteria levels exceed 1000 CCE, a yellow swim advisory flag is implemented. For more information please refer to the USEPA Recreational Water Quality Criteria (http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/health/recreation). Historically, the Chicago Park District used the culture based analysis method and statistical prediction models to monitor beach water quality. The culture based method tests for Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria which is an indicator species for the presence of disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and protozoans that may pose health risks to the public. This method requires 18-24 hours of processing to receive results. The Chicago Park District would use results of the culture based method to notify the public when levels exceed UPEPA recommended levels, which is 235* CFU. When bacteria levels exceed 235 CFU, a yellow swim advisory flag was implemented. This standard is still used at most beaches throughout the Great Lakes region. For more information please refer to the USEPA Recreational Water Quality Criteria. The statistical prediction model forecasted real-time Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria levels present in the water. The Chicago Park District (CPD) in partnership with the US Geological Survey, developed statistical prediction models by using weather data pulled from CPD buoys (https://data.cityofchicago.org/d/qmqz-2xku) and weather stations (https://data.cityofchicago.org/d/k7hf-8y75). The Chicago Park District would use results of the predictive model to notify the public when bacteria levels would exceed 235 CFU. When bacteria levels exceed 235 CFU, a yellow swim advisory flag was implemented. * The unit of measurement for Escherichia coli is Colony Forming Units (CFU) per 100 milliliters of water. (Culture Based Method / Statistical Prediction Model) *The unit of measuring DNA is Enterococci Calibrator Cell Equivalents (CCE) per 100 milliliters of water. (Rapid Testing Analysis)
- API
Deep and/or Fast Flowing Floodway
open.piercecountywa.gov | Last Updated 2024-07-05T16:29:59.000ZNorthwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc (NHC) was contracted by Pierce County Surface Water Management to develop a map of the Deep and Fast Flowing (DFF) regulated Floodway in Pierce County because this area is not mapped by FEMA and it is not intuitive where this floodway is located within the floodplain. NHC wrote the metadata. Deep and/or fast-flowing (DFF) floodway boundary for Puyallup, Carbon, Mashell, and White Rivers, South Prairie Creek, Fennel Creek, Wapato Creek, Canyon Creek, Clarks Creek, Clear Creek, Diru Creek, Rody Creek, Clover Creek, Spanaway Creek, Morey Creek, Crescent Creek, Artondale Creek, Lacamas Creek, and Swan Creek. DFF floodway determined only for detailed study areas from new (2001-2007) model studies. For additional information on this theme Please contact Dennis Dixon at 253-798-3696 for the DFF Report.pdf. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/GISmetadata/pdbswm_regulated_dff_floodway.html). Any data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.co.pierce.wa.us/Disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).