- API
Geographic Equity Static Map Template
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2022-02-28T19:01:53.000ZThe Oakland Department of Transportation's Race and Equity Team created a Geographic Equity Toolbox to help identify priority neighborhoods. We have uploaded a zip file containing a Layer Package that will enable users to open and edit the data used in the Geographic Equity Toolbox on ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap).
- API
Campaign Finance - FPPC Form 461 - Major Donor and Independent Expenditure Committee Statement - Part 5 - Contributions (Including Loans, Forgiveness of Loans, and Loan Guarantees) and Expenditures Made
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2024-06-28T14:10:01.000ZThis dataset includes all itemized Contributions (Including Loans, Forgiveness of Loans, and Loan Guarantees) and Expenditures Made ($100 or more) e-filed on Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Form 461 "Part 5" Contributions (Including Loans, Forgiveness of Loans, and Loan Guarantees) and Expenditures Made from 2011 to the present. The data is current as of the last modified date on this dataset. See the data key for column definitions: https://data.sfgov.org/Ethics/Campaign-Finance-Data-Key/wygs-cc76
- API
Existing and Proposed Bikeways
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2023-02-07T21:53:51.000ZTo download a projected shapefile of this dataset, please click "Download Projected Shapefile: Existing and Proposed Bikeways" under "Attachments" below. Bikeways are corridors designated for bicycle travel. This layer includes Oakland’s Proposed Bikeway Network, streets proposed for bicycle improvements in Oakland's Bicycle Plan, as well as existing bikeways. Bikeways are defined by "class," each with specific characteristics (see Definition). The fields “Proposed Class” and “ExistingClass” show the proposed and current state of the network, based on these class definitions. For some existing bikeways, the proposed bikeway class is not the same as the existing class. Designations reflect existing and proposed bikeways as of December 31, 2022. This dataset was last updated February 7, 2023. Data is typically updated twice per year, in January and July. Class type (0, 0.0, 1, 1X, 2, 2.0, 2.3, 2.3A, 2.3B, 2B, 2B.0, 2B.2, 2B.3, 2B.3A, 3, 3.0, 3A, 3A.0, 3A.3, 3B, or 4, 4.2, 4.2B, and 4.3A) appears in the ProposedClass (ProposedCl) and ExistingClass (ExistingCl) fields. If the Class doesn't include a decimal point, the bikeway is existing (or proposed) on both sides of a two-way street or on one side of a one-way street. A decimal point indicates that there is a different class on each side of a two-way street. Class 1 = bike paths, paved rights-of-way that are completely separated from the street, and typically shared with pedestrians. (Class 1X denotes a path that is thought to be substandard, like the Posey Tube, due to width or other factors.) Class 2 & variants = bike lanes, lanes striped on streets and designated specifically for bicyclists. • Class 2 = bike lanes • Class 2.0 = bike lanes one side of the street, no facility one side of street • Class 2.3 = bike lanes one side of street, signage only bike route one side of street • Class 2.3A = bike lanes one side of street, sharrows one side of collector or arterial street • Class 2.3B = bike lanes one side of street, sharrows one side of local street • Class 2B = buffered bike lanes • Class 2B.0 = buffered bike lanes one side of street, no facility one side of street • Class 2B.2 = buffered bike lanes one side of street, bike lanes one side of street • Class 2B.3A = buffered bike lanes one side of the street, sharrows one side of street Class 3 = bike routes, streets on which bicyclists share travel lanes with drivers and are designated by wayfinding signage only. Routes with sharrows are designated as Class 3A. (One-way facilities on two-way streets are designated as 3.0 or 3A.0, respectively.) • Class 3B = neighborhood bike routes (AKA bike boulevards), bikeways on residential streets that prioritize through trips for bicyclists. Oakland’s Class 3B facilities are designated with pavement markings, traffic calming measures, and may have wayfinding signage. Class 4 = parking protected bikeways, striped on streets, separated from moving traffic by striped buffers and/or vertical elements (delineators, planters, curb). Variants include 4.2B and 4.2 for separated bike lanes on one side and buffered or plain bike lanes on the other side. Class 0 = no bikeway is proposed or existing, as applicable. (There are three sign-only segments that are currently existing, but not proposed.) Class 0.0 = no bikeway is existing but the street is ridable in it's current condition.
- API
Campaign Finance - FPPC Form 460 - Schedule D - Summary of Expenditures Supporting/Opposing Other Candidates, Measures and Committees
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2024-06-28T13:52:02.000ZThis dataset includes all itemized expenditures supporting/opposing other candidates, measures and committees ($100 or more) e-filed on Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Form 460 Schedule "D" Expenditures Supporting/Opposing Other Candidates, Measures and Committees from 2011 to the present. The data is current as of the last modified date on this dataset. See the data key for column definitions: https://data.sfgov.org/Ethics/Campaign-Finance-Data-Key/wygs-cc76
- API
existing and proposed bikeways
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2023-02-07T21:48:16.000ZBikeways are corridors designated for bicycle travel. This layer includes Oakland’s Proposed Bikeway Network, streets proposed for bicycle improvements in Oakland's Bicycle Plan (last updated July 2019) as well as existing bikeways. Bikeways are defined by "class," each with specific characteristics (see Definition). The fields “Proposed Class” and “ExistingClass” show the proposed and current state of the network, based on these class definitions. For some existing bikeways, the proposed bikeway class is not the same as the existing class. Designations reflect existing and proposed bikeways as of June 30, 2020 This dataset was last updated July 28, 2020. Data is typically updated in January and July. Class type (0, 1, 2, 2.0, 2.3A, 2B, 2B.0, 2B.3A, 2B.2, 3, 3.0, 3A, 3A.0, 3B, or 4, 4.2, 4.2B, 4.3A and 4.4.2B) appears in the ProposedClass (ProposedCl) and ExistingClass (ExistingCl) fields. If the Class doesn't include a decimal point, the bikeway is existing (or proposed) on both sides of a two-way street or on one side of a one-way street. A decimal point indicates that there is a different class on each side of a two-way street. Class 1 = bike paths, paved rights-of-way that are completely separated from the street, and typically shared with pedestrians. Class 2 & variants = bike lanes, lanes striped on streets and designated specifically for bicyclists. • Class 2 = bike lanes • Class 2.0 = bike lanes one side of the street, no facility one side of street • Class 2.3A = bike lanes one side of thre street, sharrows one side of street • Class 2B = buffered bike lanes • Class 2B.0 = buffered bike lanes one side of street, no facility one side of street • Class 2B.3A = buffered bike lanes one side of the street, sharrows one side of street • Class 2B.2 = buffered bike lanes one side of street, bike lanes one side of street Class 3 = bike routes, streets on which bicyclists share travel lanes with drivers and are designated by wayfinding signage only. Routes with sharrows are designated as Class 3A. (One-way facilities on two-way streets are designated as 3.0 or 3A.0, respectively.) • Class 3B = bike boulevards, bikeways on residential streets that prioritize through trips for bicyclists. Oakland’s Class 3B facilities are designated with pavement markings, traffic calming measures, and wayfinding signage. Class 4 = parking protected bikeways, striped on streets, separated from moving traffic by striped buffers and/or vertical elements (delineators, planters, curb). Variant include 4.2B for separated bike lanes on one side and buffered bike lanes on one side (etc.). Class 0 = no bikeway is proposed or existing, as applicable. (There are three sign-only segments that are currently existing, but not proposed.) The other fields in this dataset are listed below. However, they are no longer maintained and will be replaced within the coming months. For information on project status, see the online map at http://arcg.is/1PfvC1. Or contact bikeped@oaklandca.gov. Striping Status (Installed, Designed, InDesign) Signage Status (Installed, Designed, InDesign) Priority Project StripeInSt = month that a bikeway was first striped on this segment StripeIn_1 = year that a bikeway was first striped on this segment Signinstal = month that bike wayfinding signs were first installed SignInSt_1 = year that bike wayfinding signs were first installed SignType = MUTCD designation of installed signs
- API
Campaign Finance - FPPC Form 460 - Schedule F - Accrued Expenses (Unpaid Bills)
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2024-06-28T13:50:57.000ZThis dataset includes all itemized accrued expenses ($100 or more) e-filed on Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Form 460 Schedule "F" Accrued Expenses (Unpaid Bills) from 2011 to the present. The data is current as of the last modified date on this dataset. See the data key for column definitions: https://data.sfgov.org/Ethics/Campaign-Finance-Data-Key/wygs-cc76
- API
Equity Indicators by Least Equitable Score
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2018-08-07T15:35:31.000ZThe Indicators chosen represent the best proxies we could find for the complex disparity themes we set out to measure. The following criteria were used to determining the indicators included in each of the topics in the final framework: 1. Data is available, high quality, and from a reliable source. 2. We will be able to calculate change over time (i.e., data is updated and accessible on an annual basis and changes from year to year can be meaningfully interpreted). 3. There is a strong causal model for why this Indicator matters (i.e., we understand the context behind the Indicator and how disparities affect people). 4. The data accurately represents the impact of inequity on people’s lives (e.g., not measuring quantity when what matters is quality).
- API
Equity Indicator Scores
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2018-08-06T22:37:42.000ZThe Indicators chosen represent the best proxies we could find for the complex disparity themes we set out to measure. The following criteria were used to determining the indicators included in each of the topics in the final framework: 1. Data is available, high quality, and from a reliable source. 2. We will be able to calculate change over time (i.e., data is updated and accessible on an annual basis and changes from year to year can be meaningfully interpreted). 3. There is a strong causal model for why this Indicator matters (i.e., we understand the context behind the Indicator and how disparities affect people). 4. The data accurately represents the impact of inequity on people’s lives (e.g., not measuring quantity when what matters is quality).
- API
Equity Indicators Ratio-to-Score Conversion
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2018-07-30T21:04:36.000ZThe standard approach for scoring Indicators is to calculate the ratio between the outcomes for the least and most advantaged racial/ethnic groups. This ratio is then converted to an Equity Score using a standard algorithm developed by CUNY ISLG. Scores are on a scale from 1 to 100, with 1 representing the highest possible inequity and 100 representing highest possible equity.
- API
Equity Background
data.oaklandca.gov | Last Updated 2020-11-10T16:45:54.688ZOakland has a long history of activism around issues of justice and equity. Both oppression and this resistance to oppression have shaped the city’s past and the lives of its residents to this day. It is, therefore, not surprising that Oakland was chosen in 2017 to be among the first cohort of five cities to develop local Equity Indicators tools in partnership with the City University of New York’s Institute for State and Local Governance (CUNY ISLG) and with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation.