- API
autism prevalence studies
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2023-05-02T17:46:55.000ZThis data table provides a collection of information from peer-reviewed autism prevalence studies. Information reported from each study includes the autism prevalence estimate and additional study characteristics (e.g., case ascertainment and criteria). A PubMed search was conducted to identify studies published at any time through September 2020 using the search terms: autism (title/abstract) OR autistic (title/abstract) AND prevalence (title/abstract). Data were abstracted and included if the study fulfilled the following criteria: • The study was published in English; • The study produced at least one autism prevalence estimate; and • The study was population-based (any age range) within a defined geographic area.
- API
Vaccine Hesitancy for COVID-19: Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs)
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2021-06-17T19:56:28.000ZDue to the change in the survey instrument regarding intention to vaccinate, our estimates for “hesitant or unsure” or “hesitant” derived from April 14-26, 2021, are not directly comparable with prior Household Pulse Survey data and should not be used to examine trends in hesitancy. To support state and local communication and outreach efforts, ASPE developed state, county, and sub-state level predictions of hesitancy rates(https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/vaccine-hesitancy) using the most recently available federal survey data. We estimate hesitancy rates at the state level using the U.S. Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey (HPS)(https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/household-pulse-survey.html) data and utilize the estimated values to predict hesitancy rates in more granular areas using the Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS)(https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/microdata.html). Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA) level – PUMAs are geographic areas within each state that contain no fewer than 100,000 people. PUMAs can consist of part of a single densely populated county or can combine parts or all of multiple counties that are less densely populated. The HPS is nationally representative and includes information on U.S. residents’ intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine when available, as well as other sociodemographic and geographic (state, region and metropolitan statistical areas) information. The ACS is a nationally representative survey, and it provides key sociodemographic and geographic (state, region, PUMAs, county) information. We utilized data for the survey collection period May 26, 2021 – June 7, 2021, which the HPS refers to as Week 31. County and State Hesitancy Data - https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/Vaccine-Hesitancy-for-COVID-19-County-and-local-es/q9mh-h2tw
- API
Vaccination Coverage and Exemptions among Kindergartners
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2024-05-24T18:03:21.000ZVaccination Coverage and Exemptions among Kindergartners • Data on school vaccination coverage and exemptions from the School Vaccination Assessment Program for kindergartners at the national and state levels. • Additional information available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/schoolvaxview/index.html
- API
NCHS - Childhood Mortality Rates
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2022-04-01T18:36:17.000ZThis dataset of U.S. mortality trends since 1900 highlights childhood mortality rates by age group for age at death. Age-adjusted death rates (deaths per 100,000) after 1998 are calculated based on the 2000 U.S. standard population. Populations used for computing death rates for 2011–2017 are postcensal estimates based on the 2010 census, estimated as of July 1, 2010. Rates for census years are based on populations enumerated in the corresponding censuses. Rates for noncensus years between 2000 and 2010 are revised using updated intercensal population estimates and may differ from rates previously published. Data on age-adjusted death rates prior to 1999 are taken from historical data (see References below). Age groups for childhood death rates are based on age at death. SOURCES CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, historical data, 1900-1998 (see https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_historical_data.htm); CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm); and CDC WONDER (see http://wonder.cdc.gov). REFERENCES 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Data Warehouse. Comparability of cause-of-death between ICD revisions. 2008. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/comparability_icd.htm. 2. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics data available. Mortality multiple cause files. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm. 3. Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Arias E. Deaths: Final data for 2017. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 68 no 9. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf. 4. Arias E, Xu JQ. United States life tables, 2017. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 68 no 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_07-508.pdf. 5. National Center for Health Statistics. Historical Data, 1900-1998. 2009. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_historical_data.htm.
- API
Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP) - Public Release Data
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2022-05-24T12:45:57.000ZThe Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP) was a research project conducted by the Botswana Ministry of Health (MOH), Harvard School of Public Health/Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership (BHP), and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). BCPP was a community randomized trial that examined the impact of prevention interventions on HIV incidence in 15 intervention and 15 control communities. The interventions included extensive HIV testing, linkage to care, and universal treatment services. To reduce HIV incidence in the intervention communities, the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals were used: 90% of HIV-positive persons know their status; 90% of persons who know status are to be on ART; 90% of persons on ART are to be virally suppressed. The BCPP study is composed of 2 interlocking protocols: Evaluation Protocol and Intervention Protocol. The Evaluation Protocol of the BCPP evaluated the primary endpoint (HIV incidence), as well as some key related secondary endpoints. This protocol focused on the Baseline Household Survey; the HIV Incidence Cohort; and an End of Study Survey. The Intervention Protocol of the BCPP implemented the combination prevention (CP) intervention package in CPCs and measures the uptake of these interventions (expanded HIV testing and counselling, strengthened male circumcision, and expanded HIV Care and Treatment).
- API
Tests for antibodies to trachoma PGP3 antigen
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2019-03-14T15:55:23.000ZThis set includes data used in a latent class model to compare testing platforms for detection of antibodies against the Chlamydia trachomatis antigen Pgp3. The analysis was published as: Latent class modeling to compare testing platforms for detection of antibodies against the Chlamydia trachomatis antigen Pgp3. Wiegand RE, Cooley G, Goodhew B, Banniettis N, Kohlhoff S, Gwyn S, Martin DL. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 9;8(1):4232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22708-9. PMID: 29523810
- API
Percentage of Drivers and Front Seat Passengers Wearing Seat Belts, 2012 & 2014, Region 1 - Boston
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2016-09-14T12:58:06.000ZSource for 2012 national data: National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), 2012. Source for 2014 national data: National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), 2014. Source for 2012 state data: State Observational Survey of Seat Belt Use, 2012. Source for 2014 state data: Seat Belt Use in 2014- Use Rates in the States and Territories
- API
Percentage of Drivers and Front Seat Passengers Wearing Seat Belts, 2012 & 2014, Region 1 - Boston, Column Chart
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2016-10-18T14:13:20.000ZSource for 2012 national data: National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), 2012. Source for 2014 national data: National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), 2014. Source for 2012 state data: State Observational Survey of Seat Belt Use, 2012. Source for 2014 state data: Seat Belt Use in 2014- Use Rates in the States and Territories
- API
CDC.gov metrics hits by year
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2022-07-13T17:09:55.000ZFor more information on CDC.gov metrics please see http://www.cdc.gov/metrics/
- API
Percentage of Drivers and Front Seat Passengers Wearing Seat Belts, 2012 & 2014, Region 9 - San Francisco
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2016-09-14T12:23:12.000ZSource for 2012 national data: National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), 2012. Source for 2014 national data: National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS), 2014. Source for 2012 state data: State Observational Survey of Seat Belt Use, 2012. Source for 2014 state data: Seat Belt Use in 2014- Use Rates in the States and Territories