- API
MD iMAP: Maryland Licensed Animal Plant Facilities - Animal Control Facilities
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2020-01-25T00:30:02.000ZThis is a MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at http://imap.maryland.gov. Point layer of animal control facilities licensed by the Maryland Department of Agriculture (MDA).Last Update: 2012Feature Service Link:http://geodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Agriculture/MD_LicensedAnimalPlantFacilities/FeatureServer/1 ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS: The Spatial Data and the information therein (collectively "the Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind either expressed implied or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct indirect incidental consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.
- API
MD COVID-19 - First Outreach Within 24 Hours of Case Entered into CovidLINK
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2022-08-23T10:53:26.000Z<b>NOTE:</b> THIS LAYER IS DEPRECATED (Last updated 6/7/2022). Was formerly updated weekly. <b>Summary</b> The daily percentage of confirmed COVID-19 cases that are entered into covidLINK that have received a first contact tracing contact attempt within 24 hours of entry. <b>Description</b> The MD COVID-19 - First Outreach Within 24 Hours of Case Entered into CovidLINK data layer reflects the daily percentage of confirmed COVID-19 cases that are entered into covidLINK that have received a first contact attempt within 24 hours of entry. The first outreach attempt is defined as a documented phone call. Individuals that responded to outreach attempts were verified as the intended call recipient are considered successfully reached. Data are updated weekly on Wednesday during the 10 a.m. hour (data is reported through the previous Saturday). <b>Terms of Use</b> The Spatial Data, and the information therein, (collectively the "Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed, implied, or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted, nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data, nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.
- API
Animal Control Facilities Licensed for FY 2017 (July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 ) - Updated 11/21/2016
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2018-02-16T14:37:57.000ZAnimal Control Facilities Licensed for FY 2017
- API
MDA Animal Control Facilities with 2014 Renewals
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2019-04-19T17:51:33.000ZThis dataset shows all MDA animal control facilities and shelters which are due for license renewal in 2014.
- API
Licensed Animal Control Facility for Fiscal Year 2018 (July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018)
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2017-10-31T19:10:00.000Z2018 Animal Control Facility
- API
SHIP Fall-Related Death Rate 2009-2021
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2024-02-22T19:40:40.000ZFall-Related Death Rate - This indicator shows the rate of fall-related deaths per 100,000 population. Falls are a major cause of preventable death among the elderly and have increased across age groups in the past decade. Causes of fall-related deaths differ between the elderly and young and middle-aged populations, and require different prevention strategies. In 2009, falls accounted for 30% of accidental deaths. <a href="https://health.maryland.gov/pophealth/Documents/SHIP/SHIP%20Lite%20Data%20Details/Fall.pdf" > Link to Data Details </a>
- API
GOPI Resource: Percentage of Current Support Paid
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2023-11-20T17:35:34.000ZCHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION The performance measures are used to evaluate each State's performance and measure results in the Child Support Enforcement program. These measures emphasize paternity establishment, support order establishment, collection of current support, collection of arrearages, and cost effectiveness. The performance measures, except cost effectiveness which can only be measured annually, are calculated from data which is reported on federal form OCSE 157. CASES WITH SUPPORT ORDERS This metric measures the proportion of IV-D cases with support orders established. Equation: Number of IV-D Cases with Support Orders divided by Total Number of IV-D Cases IV-D Paternity Establishment Percentage: This metric measures the proportion of children in the IV-D caseload as of the end of the preceding FFY who were born out of wedlock is the total number of children in the IV-D caseload in the federal fiscal year born out of wedlock with paternity established or acknowledged divided by the total number of children in the IV-D caseload as of the end of the preceding FFY who were born out of wedlock. . Equation: Total # of Children in IV-D Caseload in the Federal Fiscal Year or, as of the end of the Fiscal Year who were born out of wedlock with Paternity Established or Acknowledged divided by Total # of Children in IV-D Caseload as of the end of the preceding Federal Fiscal Year who were Born Out of Wedlock COLLECTIONS ON CURRENT SUPPORT This measure focuses on the proportion of current support due that is collected on IV-D cases. Equation: Total Dollars Collected for Current Support in IV-D Cases during the Federal Fiscal Year divided by Total Dollars Owed for Current Support in IV-D Cases during the Federal Fiscal Year COLLECTIONS ON ARREARS The measure assesses efforts to collect money from those cases with an arrearage due. The measure specifically counts paying cases, and not total arrears dollars collected. Equation: Total number of IV-D cases paying toward arrears during the Federal Fiscal Year divided by Total number of IV-D cases with arrears due
- API
GOPI Resource: Percentage of Cases in the State Child Support Caseload with Support Orders
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2023-11-20T17:35:34.000ZCHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION The performance measures are used to evaluate each State's performance and measure results in the Child Support Enforcement program. These measures emphasize paternity establishment, support order establishment, collection of current support, collection of arrearages, and cost effectiveness. The performance measures, except cost effectiveness which can only be measured annually, are calculated from data which is reported on federal form OCSE 157. CASES WITH SUPPORT ORDERS This metric measures the proportion of IV-D cases with support orders established. Equation: Number of IV-D Cases with Support Orders divided by Total Number of IV-D Cases IV-D Paternity Establishment Percentage: This metric measures the proportion of children in the IV-D caseload as of the end of the preceding FFY who were born out of wedlock is the total number of children in the IV-D caseload in the federal fiscal year born out of wedlock with paternity established or acknowledged divided by the total number of children in the IV-D caseload as of the end of the preceding FFY who were born out of wedlock. . Equation: Total # of Children in IV-D Caseload in the Federal Fiscal Year or, as of the end of the Fiscal Year who were born out of wedlock with Paternity Established or Acknowledged divided by Total # of Children in IV-D Caseload as of the end of the preceding Federal Fiscal Year who were Born Out of Wedlock COLLECTIONS ON CURRENT SUPPORT This measure focuses on the proportion of current support due that is collected on IV-D cases. Equation: Total Dollars Collected for Current Support in IV-D Cases during the Federal Fiscal Year divided by Total Dollars Owed for Current Support in IV-D Cases during the Federal Fiscal Year COLLECTIONS ON ARREARS The measure assesses efforts to collect money from those cases with an arrearage due. The measure specifically counts paying cases, and not total arrears dollars collected. Equation: Total number of IV-D cases paying toward arrears during the Federal Fiscal Year divided by Total number of IV-D cases with arrears due
- API
Department of Human Services(DHS): Child Support Enforcement Administration Performance Measures
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2023-11-20T17:35:34.000ZCHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION The performance measures are used to evaluate each State's performance and measure results in the Child Support Enforcement program. These measures emphasize paternity establishment, support order establishment, collection of current support, collection of arrearages, and cost effectiveness. The performance measures, except cost effectiveness which can only be measured annually, are calculated from data which is reported on federal form OCSE 157. CASES WITH SUPPORT ORDERS This metric measures the proportion of IV-D cases with support orders established. Equation: Number of IV-D Cases with Support Orders divided by Total Number of IV-D Cases IV-D Paternity Establishment Percentage: This metric measures the proportion of children in the IV-D caseload as of the end of the preceding FFY who were born out of wedlock is the total number of children in the IV-D caseload in the federal fiscal year born out of wedlock with paternity established or acknowledged divided by the total number of children in the IV-D caseload as of the end of the preceding FFY who were born out of wedlock. . Equation: Total # of Children in IV-D Caseload in the Federal Fiscal Year or, as of the end of the Fiscal Year who were born out of wedlock with Paternity Established or Acknowledged divided by Total # of Children in IV-D Caseload as of the end of the preceding Federal Fiscal Year who were Born Out of Wedlock COLLECTIONS ON CURRENT SUPPORT This measure focuses on the proportion of current support due that is collected on IV-D cases. Equation: Total Dollars Collected for Current Support in IV-D Cases during the Federal Fiscal Year divided by Total Dollars Owed for Current Support in IV-D Cases during the Federal Fiscal Year COLLECTIONS ON ARREARS The measure assesses efforts to collect money from those cases with an arrearage due. The measure specifically counts paying cases, and not total arrears dollars collected. Equation: Total number of IV-D cases paying toward arrears during the Federal Fiscal Year divided by Total number of IV-D cases with arrears due
- API
MD iMAP: Maryland Green Infrastructure - Green Infrastructure Hubs And Corridors
opendata.maryland.gov | Last Updated 2020-01-25T00:17:32.000ZThis is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at http://imap.maryland.gov. These data map hub and corridor elements within the green infrastructure. The Green Infrastructure Assessment was developed to provide decision support for Maryland's Department of Natural Resources land conservation programs. Methods used to identify and rank green infrastructure lands are intended soley for this use. Other applications are at the discretion of the user. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources is not responsible for any inaccuracies in the data and does not necessarily endorse any uses or products derived from the data other than those for which the data were originally intended. Maryland's green infrastructure is a network of undeveloped lands that provide the bulk of the state's natural support system. Ecosystem services - such as cleaning the air - filtering water - storing and cycling nutrients - conserving soils - regulating climate - and maintaining hydrologic function - are all provided by the existing expanses of forests - wetlands - and other natural lands. These ecologically valuable lands also provide marketable goods and services - like forest products - fish and wildlife - and recreation. The Green Infrastructure serves as vital habitat for wild species and contributes in many ways to the health and quality of life for Maryland residents. To identify and prioritize Maryland's green infrastructure - we developed a tool called the Green Infrastructure Assessment (GIA). The GIA was based on principles of landscape ecology and conservation biology - and provides a consistent approach to evaluating land conservation and restoration efforts in Maryland. It specifically attempts to recognize: a variety of natural resource values (as opposed to a single species of wildlife - for example) - how a given place fits into a larger system - the ecological importance of natural open space in rural and developed areas - the importance of coordinating local - state and even interstate planning - and the need for a regional or landscape-level view for wildlife conservation. The GIA identified two types of important resource lands - hubs"" and ""corridors."" Hubs typically large contiguous areas - separated by major roads and/or human land uses - that contain one or more of the following: Large blocks of contiguous interior forest (containing at least 250 acres - plus a transition zone of 300 feet) Large wetland complexes - with at least 250 acres of unmodified wetlands; Important animal and plant habitats of at least 100 acres - including rare - threatened - and endangered species locations - unique ecological communities - and migratory bird habitats; relatively pristine stream and river segments (which - when considered with adjacent forests and wetlands - are at least 100 acres) that support trout - mussels - and other sensitive aquatic organisms; and existing protected natural resource lands which contain one or more of the above (for example - state parks and forests - National Wildlife Refuges - locally owned reservoir properties - major stream valley parks - and Nature Conservancy preserves). In the GIA model - the above features were identified from Geographic Information Systems (GIS) spatial data that covered the entire state. Developed areas and major roads were excluded - areas less than 100 contiguous acres were dropped - adjacent forest and wetland were added to the remaining hubs - and the edges were smoothed. The average size of all hubs in the state is approximately 2200 acres. Corridors are linear features connecting hubs together to help animals and plant propagules to move between hubs. Corridors were identified using many sets of data - including land cover - roads - streams - slope - flood plains - aquatic resource data - and fish blockages. Generally speaking - corridors connect hubs of similar type (hubs containing forests are connected to one ano