- General Fund
The revenue surplus (deficit) of Kent County, MI was $2,222,801 in 2022.
General Fund Balance Per Capita
General Fund Unrestricted Balance
Liquidity Ratio
Revenue Surplus (Deficit)
Total General Fund Expenditures
Total General Fund Revenue
The General Fund is the primary budget for a government entity.
General Fund Balance Per Capita is the balance of General Fund per resident
General Fund Unrestricted Balance is the part of fund balance that is not restricted by external creditors (such as through debt covenants), grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; nor restricted through imposition law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.
Liquidity Ratio is the ratio of assets to liabilities for a government entity.
Revenue Surplus (Deficit) is the excess general fund revenues over expenditures.
Total General Fund Expenditures refers to decreases in net financial resources.
Total General Fund Revenues are the gross receipts and receivables of a governmental unit derived from taxes and other sources.
Above charts are based on data from the MICommunity Financial Dashboard | ODN Dataset | API -
Finance and General Fund Datasets Involving Kent County, MI
- API
Financial Health Dashboard
mischooldata.data.socrata.com | Last Updated 2017-08-09T01:27:17.000ZOpen Michigan (OpenMichigan@michigan.gov) is the official State of Michigan account. Any items created by other user accounts are not endorsed by the State of Michigan. Standard financial reports are highly technical and complex, making it difficult to determine the real condition of government's financial health. The information provided in this dashboard provides measurements that are easy to understand, providing a clear picture of the financial health of government in Michigan. With measurements ranging from how government is doing in addressing pension obligations to information on total revenue and expenditures, this dashboard provides key metrics for financial health.
- API
Financial Trends Monitoring System Data
data.kcmo.org | Last Updated 2023-12-28T20:15:45.000ZThis data is pulled from the annual Financial Trends Monitoring System (FTMS). The KCSTAT dashboards for Finance and Governance provide visualizations of this data, along with narrative to explain what these indicators mean. The FTMS report itself goes also provides a great deal of narrative, and can be viewed by visiting: https://kcstat.kcmo.org/Finance/2013-FTMS-7-29-14-Revised/n7p4-kkha
- API
County Spending
data.montgomerycountymd.gov | Last Updated 2024-07-25T05:49:58.000ZThis dataset includes County spending data for Montgomery County government. It does not include agency spending. Data considered sensitive or confidential and will be encrypted before it is posted.
- API
119- FY 2019 Proposed, Performance Metrics, Obj 1.1
performance.princegeorgescountymd.gov | Last Updated 2018-05-02T19:03:43.000ZOMB Performance Metrics Objective 1.1- Maintain the County’s General Fund balance at or above 7% of the General Fund budget, FY 2019 Proposed Budget
- API
Campaign Finance Summary
data.wa.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-25T18:25:00.000ZThis data set contains a summary of information about candidate campaigns and political committees by election year. For candidate campaigns and single-year/election committees, a single record is provided that covers all activity of the campaign for the given election year. Information for continuing political committees is summarized by calendar/reporting year. The data set covers that prior 16 years plus the current election year. The data are compiled from the campaign reports deposit (C3), campaign summary reports (C4), campaign registrations (C1/C1pc) and candidate declarations and elections data provided to the PDC by the Washington Secretary of State. Records are updated in near real-time, typically less than 2 minutes from the time the campaign submits new data. This dataset is a best-effort by the PDC to provide a complete set of records as described herewith. The PDC provides access to the original reports for the purpose of record verification. Descriptions attached to this dataset do not constitute legal definitions; please consult RCW 42.17A and WAC Title 390 for legal definitions and additional information regarding political finance disclosure requirements. CONDITION OF RELEASE: This publication and or referenced documents constitutes a list of individuals prepared by the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission and may not be used for commercial purposes. This list is provided on the condition and with the understanding that the persons receiving it agree to this statutorily imposed limitation on its use. See RCW 42.56.070(9) and AGO 1975 No. 15.
- API
Green Jobs - Green New York (GJGNY) Residential Loan Portfolio: Beginning November 2010
data.ny.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-12T14:47:19.000ZThe dataset represents information on the performance of the portfolio of loans issued through the GJGNY Residential Loan Fund. The loan performance results of the GJGNY portfolio have shown strong performance to date, with lower levels of delinquencies and defaults/losses than other consumer loan asset classes. This performance data is useful to lender/capital providers, rating agencies, researchers, and interested stakeholders to assist in anticipating performance results for their-party financing products aimed at consumer clean energy financing. Users can access an Interactive Dashboard with charts, graphs, and tables at https://nyserda.ny.gov/Researchers-and-Policymakers/Green-Jobs-Green-New-York/Data-and-Trends How does your organization use this dataset? What other NYSERDA or energy-related datasets would you like to see on Open NY? Let us know by emailing OpenNY@nyserda.ny.gov. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA’s programs, visit https://nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.
- API
Skilled Nursing Center Costs Utah 2019
opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2022-11-09T19:20:27.000ZThe Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Cost Report dataset is a public use file that provides select measures from the skilled nursing facility annual cost report. This data includes provider information such as facility characteristics, utilization data, cost and charges by cost center (in total and for Medicare), Medicare settlement data, and financial statement data organized by CMS Certification Number.
- API
Utah Hospitals Cost Report 2015
opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-12-06T18:23:32.000ZThis data set contains the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) annual update to the Utah Hospital Cost Report Public Use File (Hospital Cost Report PUF) with data for 2015. The PUF is organized at the hospital-level and includes select facility characteristics, utilization measures, cost and charges by cost center (in total and for Medicare), Medicare settlement data, and financial statement data.
- API
Hospital Provider Cost Report Utah 2019
opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2022-11-09T19:35:22.000ZThe Hospital Provider Cost Report dataset provides select measures from the hospital annual cost report. This data includes provider information such as facility characteristics, utilization data, cost and charges by cost center (in total and for Medicare), Medicare settlement data, and financial statement data organized by CMS Certification Number.
- API
Lobbyist Bi-Monthly Reports: Beginning 2019
data.ny.gov | Last Updated 2024-08-02T15:58:41.000ZAny Principal Lobbyist required to file a Statement of Registration for a Client in a biennial period must also file Bi-monthly Reports, regardless of Compensation, Expenses, or Lobbying Activity, up to the Lobbying Agreement Termination (End) Date. The Bi-monthly Report requires the Filer to disclose the Lobbying Activities that occurred, and monies spent during the applicable reporting period. Proper disclosure of these Lobbying Activities necessitates a level of specificity that makes clear to the public exactly what and who was being lobbied during the specific Bi-monthly reporting period.