Find A Missouri Utility

WAOFM - Census - Population and Housing, 2000 and 2010

Population and housing information extracted from decennial census Public Law 94-171 redistricting summary files for Washington state for years 2000 and 2010.

Average Water Network Capacity by Hexagon Area

This dataset provides the average water network capacity (2023) within 200m x 200m hexagons, in Litres/second, for the City of Edmonton. The following colours describe the capacity of the city block area water system under computer-simulated conditions using EPCOR-owned hydrants: Red: 0-50 L/s Yellow: 50-100 L/s Light Green: 100-150 L/s Dark Green: 150-200 L/s Teal: 200-250 L/s Blue: 250-300 L/s Purple: 300 L/s and up No Data: No EPCOR-owned hydrants in Area Important Considerations: * EPCOR provides this data for information purposes only. EPCOR makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, including that the data is true, accurate, complete, fit for a specific purpose or non-infringing, and no responsibility of any kind is accepted by EPCOR or EPCOR representatives for the completeness or accuracy of the data. EPCOR and its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and other representatives shall not be liable to any person or entity as a result of the use or other handling of the data. * The hexagon grid utilized to present the average water network capacity data has been updated by EPCOR. As such, this version of the dataset should not be directly compared to previous versions of this dataset. * The average water network capacity is intended to be understood in a relative manner: e.g. a blue area is anticipated to provide higher flows on average than a green area. * Any city block area that indicates 0-50 L/s water network capacity has been evaluated by Edmonton Fire Rescue Services (EFRS). EFRS does not associate any significant risk with these areas and can adapt a response to a fire event in these areas given the small geographical area and buildings affected. * The results presented in this data were determined using computer modelling software that represented the distribution and transmission water network current in EWS's digital records as of February 16, 2023. Modifications to the water system after this date may change the water network capacity at any given time or place. * The results presented in this data represent the overall average water network capacity in an area during computer-simulated conditions at EPCOR-owned hydrants. Other factors may change the water network capacity at any given time or place. *The results presented in this data are not representative of lot-level available fire flow as outlined in the Volume 4 Design and Construction Standards. * The average water network capacity ranges are only indicative of average system capacity and not indicative of EPCOR-owned hydrant spacing. A development may still require infrastructure upgrades to meet minimum hydrant spacing requirements. * This map is not a substitute for directed engineering inquiries regarding infrastructure improvements to support development. Please contact EPCOR Water at wtrdc@epcor.com to determine fire protection requirements for development.

Surface Water Quality Assessments

This is the 2014 Integrated Report. EPA approved this submission in accordance with Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314(l) of the Clean Water Act, on October 16, 2015. The Integrated Report (IR) combines two water quality reports required under sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) requires states, territories and authorized tribes to perform annual water quality assessments to determine the status of jurisdictional waters. Section 303(d) requires states, territories and authorized tribes to identify waters assessed as not meeting water quality standards(see Code of Maryland Regulations 26.08.02). Waters that do not meet standards may require a Total Maximum Daily Load to determine the maximum amount of an impairing substance or pollutant that a particular water body can assimilate and still meet water quality criteria. Historically, the 303(d) List and the 305(b) report were submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as separate documents but more recent guidance has called for combining these two reports into a single biennial publication. More information is available at http://www.mde.state.md.us/PROGRAMS/WATER/TMDL/INTEGRATED303DREPORTS/Pages/Programs/WaterPrograms/TMDL/Maryland%20303%20dlist/index.aspx A searchable version of this data is available at http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Water/TMDL/Integrated303dReports/Pages/303d.aspx

Beach and Creek Monitoring Results

Water samples from natural recreational waters in San Mateo County are sampled each week for concentrations of indicator bacteria including E. Coli, Enterococcus, and Coliform bacteria. If concentrations of indicator bacteria exceed State or County standards, the area is posted to warn users that they may become ill if they engage in water contact activities in the posted area. More information about results and testing can be found on the San Mateo County Health System site: http://smchealth.org/environ/beaches This dataset contains readings from January, 2012 to the present and is updated weekly.

Citizen Statewide Lake Monitoring Assessment Program (CSLAP) Lakes

The dataset represents the lakes participating in the Citizen Statewide Lake Monitoring Assessment Program (CSLAP). CSLAP is a volunteer lake monitoring and education program that is managed by DEC and New York State Federation of Lake Associations (NYSFOLA). The data collected through the program is used to identify water quality issues, detect seasonal and long term patterns, and inform volunteers and lake residents about water quality conditions in their lake. The program has delivered high quality data to many DEC programs for over 25 years.The dataset catalogs CSLAP lake information; including: lake name, lake depth, public accessibility, trophic status, watershed area, elevation, lake area, water quality classification, county, town, CSLAP status, years sampled, and last year sampled.

Septic Systems in Boulder County Colorado

Septic system data including type, status, location, etc for dwellings within Boulder County, CO provided by Boulder County.

Safe Drinking Water Facilities Information System for Pennsylvania 2018 - Current Environmental Protection

Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) is EPA’s national database that manages and collects public water system information from states, including reports of drinking water standard violations, reporting and monitoring violations, and other basic information. The data derived in the State of Pennsylvania is published and searchable online on the www.pa.gov website. This set contains the Water System Facility data, which will be updated annually for the prior calendar year in the first Quarter of the following year.

DWR Dam Safety Non-Jurisdictional Dam

A Non-Jurisdictional Dam is a dam creating a reservoir with a capacity of 100 acre-feet or less and a surface area of 20 acres or less and with a height measured as defined in Rules 4.2.5.1 and 4.2.19 of 10 feet or less. Non-jurisdictional size dams are regulated and subject to the authority of the State Engineer consistent with sections 37- 87-102 and 37-87-105 C.R.S.

Water Quality

Prior to downloading data, please download the <b> <a href="https://data.kingcounty.gov/api/views/vwmt-pvjw/files/74efd236-ffa8-4dee-aac1-0188e110dd1c?download=true&filename=DataReadMeFile_WQ.docx">README</a></b> file. This dataset contains water quality samples collected from Puget Sound, lakes, and streams in the region which can be filtered by "Site Type" and "Area". To see where water quality samples are collected, see the <b><a href="https://data.kingcounty.gov/dataset/WLRD-Sites/wbhs-bbzf">WLRD Water Quality Collection Sites</a></b> dataset.