The population density of Central Gardens, TX was 1,963 in 2010.

Population Density

Population Density is computed by dividing the total population by Land Area Per Square Mile.

Above charts are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey | ODN Dataset | API - Notes:

1. ODN datasets and APIs are subject to change and may differ in format from the original source data in order to provide a user-friendly experience on this site.

2. To build your own apps using this data, see the ODN Dataset and API links.

3. If you use this derived data in an app, we ask that you provide a link somewhere in your applications to the Open Data Network with a citation that states: "Data for this application was provided by the Open Data Network" where "Open Data Network" links to http://opendatanetwork.com. Where an application has a region specific module, we ask that you add an additional line that states: "Data about REGIONX was provided by the Open Data Network." where REGIONX is an HREF with a name for a geographical region like "Seattle, WA" and the link points to this page URL, e.g. http://opendatanetwork.com/region/1600000US5363000/Seattle_WA

Geographic and Population Datasets Involving Central Gardens, TX

  • API

    Key Economic Indicators

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-10-01T21:22:37.000Z

    An economic indicator is a statistic about an economic activity, and they allow analysis of economic performance and predictions of current and future economic performance. The TX Comptroller’s Key Economic Indicators includes such measures for TX & the US employment and unemployment, consumer confidence, price inflation, housing data, etc. See https://comptroller.texas.gov/about/policies/privacy.php for more information on our agency’s privacy and security policies.

  • API

    CPI 1.1 Texas Child Population (ages 0-17) by County 2014-2023

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-09-05T21:23:24.000Z

    As recommended by the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to ensure consistency across all HHSC agencies, in 2012 DFPS adopted the HHSC methodology on how to categorize race and ethnicity. As a result, data broken down by race and ethnicity in 2012 and after is not directly comparable to race and ethnicity data in 2011 and before. The population totals may not match previously printed DFPS Data Books. Past population estimates are adjusted based on the U.S. Census data as it becomes available. This is important to keep the data in line with current best practices, but may cause some past counts, such as Abuse/Neglect Victims per 1,000 Texas Children, to be recalculated. Population Data Source - Population Estimates and Projections Program, Texas State Data Center, Office of the State Demographer and the Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio. Current population estimates and projections data as of December 2020. Visit dfps.texas.gov for information on all DFPS programs.

  • API

    Texas Regional Economic Snapshots

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2020-06-26T23:40:44.000Z

    Find information on population, income, jobs, wages, graduation rates, highways, water and healthcare for the Comptroller's 12 Economic Regions. See https://comptroller.texas.gov/about/policies/privacy.php for more information on our agency’s privacy and security policies.

  • API

    CPI 3.3 Abuse/Neglect Investigations - Findings by County and Region FY2014-FY2023

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-01-30T20:33:21.000Z

    Child Protective Investigations (CPI) conducts either a traditional investigation or Alternative Response (AR). Traditional investigations and Alternative Response require caseworkers to assess safety and take needed actions to protect a child while assessing any risk of abuse or neglect in the foreseeable future. AR cases present a less adversarial more collaborative approach to working with families by allowing for family engagement along with other community supports to ensure child safety. AR differs from traditional investigations in that AR cases are Priority 2 cases involving victims who are age 6 or older, there is no substantiation of allegations, no entry of perpetrators into the Central Registry (a repository for reports of child abuse and neglect), and there is a heightened focus on guiding the family to plan for safety in a way that works for them and therefore sustains the safety. Completed investigations only include those cases conducted as a traditional investigation that were not administratively closed or merged into another stage. Investigations may include more than one alleged victim. All allegations in a completed investigation are given one of the following dispositions: Reason to Believe (RTB) - defined in section 2281.2 of the CPS policy handbook Ruled Out (RO) - defined in section 2281.3 of CPS policy handbook Unable to Complete (UTC) - defined in section 2281.4 of CPS policy handbook Unable to Determine (UTD) - defined in section 2281.4 of CPS policy handbook If at least one allegation has an RTB disposition, the investigation is given an overall disposition of RTB. If there are no allegations with an RTB disposition but there is at least one allegation with a disposition of UTD, the investigation is given an overall disposition of UTD. Visit dfps.texas.gov for information on CPI Abuse/Neglect Investigations and all DFPS programs.

  • API

    SWI 1.3 Source of Report FY2014-2023

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-02-08T19:06:30.000Z

    Statewide Intake (SWI) has the responsibility to assess information received to the definitions of possible abuse, neglect or exploitation for each program served and to prioritize and route the information to the correct destination workload. SWI is the centralized point of intake for child abuse and neglect, abuse, neglect or exploitation of people age 65 or older or adults with disabilities, clients served by DSHS or DADS employees in State Hospitals or State Supported Living Centers, and children in licensed child-care facilities or treatment centers for the entire State of Texas. SWI receives intake reports for the following Programs: Adult Protective Services (APS) Adult Provider Investigations Child Protective Investigations (CPI) Day Care Licensing (DCL) Residential Child Care Licensing (RCCL) FOOTNOTES Not all reports are assigned for investigation. There can be more than one source per contact. This dashboard counts report contacts determined by the date of contact. Visit dfps.state.tx.us for information on all DFPS programs

  • API

    SWI 1.3 Source of Abuse-Neglect Report by Program FY2014-2023

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-02-08T19:07:55.000Z

    Statewide Intake (SWI) has the responsibility to assess information received to the definitions of possible abuse, neglect or exploitation for each program served and to prioritize and route the information to the correct destination workload. SWI is the centralized point of intake for child abuse and neglect, abuse, neglect or exploitation of people age 65 or older or adults with disabilities, clients served by DSHS or DADS employees in State Hospitals or State Supported Living Centers, and children in licensed child-care facilities or treatment centers for the entire State of Texas. SWI receives intake reports for the following Programs: Adult Protective Services (APS) Adult Provider Investigations Child Protective Investigations (CPI) Day Care Licensing (DCL) Residential Child Care Licensing (RCCL) Not all reports are assigned for investigation. There can be more than one source per contact. This dashboard counts report contacts determined by the date of contact. Visit dfps.state.tx.us for information on all DFPS programs

  • API

    Austin Crash Report Data - Crash Victim Demographic Records

    datahub.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2024-10-08T09:06:14.000Z

    This dataset contains crash victim records for crashes which have occurred in Austin, TX in the last ten years. It is one of two datasets which power our Vision Zero Viewer dashboard, available here: https://visionzero.austin.gov/viewer. Crash data may take several weeks to be submitted, reviewed, and finalized for inclusion in this dataset. To provide the most accurate information as possible, we only provide crash data as recent as two weeks old. Please also note that some crash records may take even longer to appear in this dataset, depending on the circumstances of the crash and the ensuing law enforcement investigation. Crash data is obtained from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Crash Record Information System (CRIS) database, which is populated by reports submitted by Texas Peace Officers throughout the state, including Austin Police Department (APD). Please note that the data and information on this website is for informational purposes only. While we seek to provide accurate information, please note that errors may be present and information presented may not be complete.

  • API

    CPI 2.1 Abuse, Neglect Intakes - Screening And Priority FY2014-FY2023

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-01-30T20:40:19.000Z

    CPI Intakes: Priority, Screening and Assignment To establish timeframes for investigations, each report of child abuse and neglect is assigned a priority: Priority I - Intake reports that concern children who appear to face an immediate risk of abuse or neglect that could result in death or serious harm. CPI must initiate the investigation within 24 hours of receiving a Priority I report. Priority II - All reports of abuse or neglect that are not assigned as Priority I are assigned as Priority II. These are reports that contain allegations of abuse or neglect in which there does not appear to be an immediate threat of serious harm or death. A subset of these reports are sent down the Alternative Response (AR)* pathway. Those reports not sent to AR continue as a traditional investigation. CPI must initiate these investigations within 72 hours of receiving a Priority II report. *In November 2014, CPI implemented Alternative Response (AR) which is a different way to respond to reports of abuse/neglect. AR allows for a more flexible, family engaging approach while still focusing on the safety of the children. AR cases differ from traditional investigations cases in that there will be no substantiation of allegations, no entry of perpetrators into the Central Registry (a repository for reports of child abuse and neglect), and there will be a heightened focus on guiding the family to plan for safety in a way that works for them and therefore sustains the safety. This dashboard addresses Texas Family Code Section 264.017(b)(1).

  • API

    CPS 2.4 Children In Legal Responsibility on August 31 by Legal Status and Average Days in Care FY2014-2023

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2024-02-12T18:17:38.000Z

    Children in DFPS custody are those for whom a court has appointed DFPS legal responsibility through temporary or permanent managing conservatorship or other court ordered legal basis. This chart includes any child in DFPS custody on August 31 of the fiscal year. A description of the different types of legal statuses is in the CPS glossary: https://www.dfps.texas.gov/About_DFPS/Data_Book/Child_Protective_Services/Resources/glossary.asp Visit dfps.texas.gov for information on Children In Legal Responsibility and all DFPS programs.

  • API

    TJJD - County Level Referral Data, FY 2013-2021

    data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2022-11-16T20:29:12.000Z

    This project is part of a larger plan to transfer commonly requested TJJD data onto the Texas Open Data Portal. This will allow for greater efficiency in sharing publicly available information and answering Public Information Requests (PIRs). County-level referral data is the source for most statistics in the “State of Juvenile Probation Activity in Texas” Report, which is published yearly. This report “provides information regarding the magnitude and nature of juvenile criminal activity and the juvenile probation system's response. This information is offered to assist the state's effort in improving the juvenile justice system and reducing juvenile crime in Texas” (State of Juvenile Probation Activity in Texas, 2020).